How did infamous Witchfinder General Matthew Hopkins begin his career as a witchfinder?
Let us turn to Hopkins own The Discovery of Witches: In Answer to severall QUERIES, LATELY Delivered to the Judges of Assize for the County of NORFOLK. And now published By MATTHEW HOPKINS, Witch-finder, FOR The Benefit of the whole KINGDOME. M. DC. XLVII, which is a sort of FAQ on his work.
---
Query 4.
I pray where was this experience gained? and why
gained by him and not by others?
Answer.
The Discoverer never travelled far for it, but in March
1644 he had some seven or eight of that horrible sect of Witches
living in the Towne where he lived, a Towne in Essex called
Maningtree, with divers other adjacent Witches of other towns,
who every six weeks in the night (being alwayes on the Friday
night) had their meeting close by his house and had their severall
solemne sacrifices there offered to the Devill, one of which this
discoverer heard speaking to her Imps one night, and bid them
goe to another Witch, who was thereupon apprehended, and searched,
by women who had for many yeares knowne the Devills
marks, and found to have three teats about her, which honest
women have not: so upon command from the Justice they were
to keep her from sleep two or three nights, expecting in that time
to see her familiars, which the fourth night she called in by their
severall names, and told them what shapes, a quarter of an houre
before they came in, there being ten of us in the roome, the first
she called was
1. Holt, who came in like a white kitling.
2. Jarmara, who came in like a fat Spaniel without any legs at
all, she said she kept him fat, for she clapt her hand on her belly
and said he suckt good blood from her body.
3. Vinegar Tom, who was like a long-legg'd Greyhound, with
an head like an Oxe, with a long taile and broad eyes, who when
this discoverer spoke to, and bade him goe to the place provided
for him and his Angels, immediately transformed himselfe into
the shape of a child of foure yeeres old without a head, and gave
halfe a dozen turnes about the house, and vanished at the doore.
4. Sack and Sugar, like a black Rabbet.
5. Newes, like a Polcat. All these vanished away in a little
time. Immediately after this Witch confessed severall other
Witches, from whom she had her Imps, and named to divers women
where their marks were, the number of their Marks, and
Imps, and Imps names, as Elemanzer, Pyewacket, Peckin the Crown,
Grizzel, Greedigut, &c. which no mortall could invent; and upon
their searches the same Markes were found, the same number, and
in the same place, and the like confessions from them of the same
Imps, (though they knew not that we were told before) and so
peached one another thereabouts that joyned together in the like
damnable practise that in our Hundred in Essex, 29. were condemned
at once, 4. brought 25. Miles to be hanged, where this
Discoverer lives, for sending the Devill like a Beare to kill him in
his garden, so by seeing diverse of the mens Papps, and trying
wayes with hundreds of them, he gained this experience, and for
ought he knowes any man else may find them as well as he and
his company, if they had the same skill and experience.
---
Let's assume that Hopkins just made this stuff up. Where did it come from? Stories he had heard about witches? Childhood stories? It is richly insane. Wikipedia says his about the time referenced above:
Hopkins states in his book The Discovery of Witches that he "never travelled far ... to gain his experience". In the early 1640s Hopkins moved to Manningtree, Essex, a town across the River Stour from Colchester, about 9 miles (14 km) from Wenham. According to tradition Hopkins used his recently acquired inheritance of a hundred marks to establish himself as a gentleman and to buy the Thorn Inn in Mistley. From the way that he presented evidence in trials, Hopkins is commonly thought to have been trained as a lawyer, but there is scant evidence to suggest this was the case.
Matthew Hopkins began hunting witches in 1644. He retired only three years later in 1647. He and his associates had been responsible for the executions of over three hundred women.
It all sounds so insanely old and ridiculous until you realize that witch
hunting is still going on today in some parts of the world.
Project Guttenberg has the full text of The Discovery of Witches HERE.
The image above is from a reprint of 1841/1852 editions of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackay and was found HERE.
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
Top ten slashers of the 70's and 80's.
Maybe you've seen some of the Platinum Dune remakes of classic slasher films and want to see the originals. Perhaps you remember being scared to death as a kid of Jason and Michael from TV commercials and schoolyard talk, but never got to see the actual films. Maybe you've seen a few of the films and want MORE. Whatever the reason you've come, welcome to slasher school. I have a full course load for you.
This actually isn't just the top ten slasher films: I've got prerequisites for you and even some extra credit. You're going to get twenty-seven films for the price of ten! Do you feel lucky, or just sick?
Like any class of this type. These are my recommendations, if you are a slasher fan and disagree, please write some alternate credit choices down in the comments.
The slasher genre seed was planted in 1960 with Peeping Tom and Psycho.
It was lovingly watered with gore in 1963, with Blood Feast.
The genre was given form by the Italian giallos from the 60's and 70's, starting with 1965's Blood and Black Lace.
In 1974, Black Christmas sprouted and the first slasher as we recognize them today, was recognized.
Shortly afterwards, in 1978, Halloween was released as the artistic prototype by which all other slasher films would be judged.
Grading.
When I watch a slasher, I'm looking for these factors, mostly in this order:
Pacing, story, lighting, music, how cool is the killer, frequency of kills, quality of kills, camerawork, nudity, production, acting.
My notes reflect the film's inclusion onto their respective list. For a quick summary of the film, look at my big chronology list of slasher films HERE (and if you have any films to add to that list, please do let me know down in the comments of this post.)
Prerequisites
Ezra Pound said there are Innovators, Masters, and Imitators. These films are from the first two categories. Your prerequisite assignment is to rush out and see the staples of the genre:
1. Halloween (1978): The king of the genre. A Masterpiece.
2. - 5. Friday the 13th parts 1 - 4 (1980 and on): Jason's days as a human. Masterpieces of the genre.
6. Black Christmas (1974): It started here. An Innovator.
7. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974): See how the slasher genre can stretch. An Innovator.
General Ed
I recommend watching these in this order. This is a real mix of films to get your brain coated with all the possibilities within the genre.
1. The Burning (1981) - My favorite slasher. I would say a Masterpiece. I wrote about it HERE.
2. The Hills Have Eyes (1977) - A fine imitation of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Fun.
3. Maniac (1980) - Downtrodden, dark, and grimy. The sleazier side of the genre. Considered a Masterpiece by many.
4. Prom Night (1980) - An excellent example of the genre. Covers all the tropes.
5. My Bloody Valentine (1981) - Could almost be a mainstream movie if not for all the murdering.
6. The Creeper (Rituals) (1977) - Made before the genre was fully formed. Survivalist horror.
7. The Prowler (1981) - Great example of the genre. Simple story. Great effects.
8. Hospital Massacre (X-Ray) (1982) - Surreal with offbeat humor.
9. Cheerleader Camp (1988) - Another good solid staple.
10. Intruder (1989) - Low budget, but with a lot of style. Clearly made with a love of the genre.
All right, so you made it. You have a good foundation for what's out there. You've seen a few films from the Urban Slasher sub-genre and a few from the Rural Slasher sub-genre. You've seen examples from Tier 1 with larger budgets and from Tier 3 with no budget. You've seen grimy, slick, and about as humorous as I'd let you stray. You've seen a few films before the genre had it's rules, a few that followed the rules perfectly, and a few that broke the rules. You should have a good sense as to what tropes and sub-genres you're interested in.
Electives
Here are are ten more tasty morsels for your eyeballs and earholes. These are all good films and you could add the many and varied Halloween and Friday the 13th sequels to this list.
1. Alone in the Dark (1982) - Spooky and helpless and scary with A-grade actors.
2. Edge of the Axe (1988) - A small town love story in the midst of a slasher film.
3. The Toolbox Murders (1978) - No story, no characters, just killing.
4. Don't Go in the Woods (1982) - Bottom of the barrel. WAY ahead of the time in terms of camerawork. The awful dubbing makes it hard to watch.
5. Sleepaway Camp (1983) - Kills are so creative that the product suffers. Fun film. Most would rank this higher. Amazing ending.
6. The House on Sorority Row (1983) - Good solid film.
7. The Slumber Party Massacre (1982) - Good solid film.
8. Pieces (1982) - Just test the waters on the Italian productions. If you like the slightly off way of storytelling, you may want to dive into the Italian Giallos.
9. Madman (1982) - Fun, rural slasher.
10. Eyes of a Stranger (1981) - Rear Window retold as a slasher. Good stuff.
You've done it. You have earned the right to call yourself a slasher film fan. I don't know what kind of sick achievement that is, but you've filled your head with a lot of wonderful garbage.
For an advanced degree, you'll need to see most of the films on my list of Slasher Films of the 70's and 80's. You'll want to watch them multiple times; establish a position on the Freddy's and Chucky's as whether or not the should be on the list; you'll want to dip your toe into giallos to see what that is all about; and most of all, you'll want to develop your own criteria, and make your own list and slap it down in the Comment section.
(Posters courtesy of Wrong Side of the Art.)
Below is Mondo's poster for The Burning. Stunning.
Monday, September 23, 2013
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
I'm not sure how fans of the original Robert Louis Stevenson book pronounce his name, but I was surprised to hear the characters in this film refer to Dr. Jekyll as "Jeek-il". I never knew. For some reason this horror classic escaped my eyeballs. I grew up with a book that had hundreds of frames from the film printed with the script (released by Picador Books) and consequently knew the film inside and out, but I had never actually seen it.
My wife and I remedied this deplorable condition and were amazed at how good Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is. I was surprised how much the film smelled like David Lynch's Blue Velvet. Good and evil splayed and divided into clear black and white. Both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Blue Velvet skate that thin line between realistic, familiar, open-jawed concern and horror, and cartoonish extremes. The first time I saw Blue Velvet I was horrified and had trouble breathing when Frank Booth was on the screen. The second time, I just couldn't stop laughing at his insanity. While Mr. Hyde's inhumanity is similar to Frank Booth's, it is mostly talked about and hinted at. A remake, starring Spencer Tracy as Mr. Hyde was made ten years later, but it was watered down by the Hayes Code's restrictions on motion picture's violent and sexual content, which went into effect in 1934.
Frederic March went on to win a Best Actor award for his portrayal of Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde at the 1931 Academy Awards. His performances were pitch perfect for each character. March's Mr. Hyde not only looked like a de-evolved monkeyman, but the dialog made it clear he was a rapist and sexual sadist. Rough stuff.
Not only was the implied violence through the roof, but this film had side-boob shots all over the place. The sexual innuendo and the amount of shown flesh was surprising for the time.
My understanding of early sound motion pictures was that the loud sounds of the camera required that it be housed in large sound-proof cells, limiting its mobility. Not in this picture. The camerawork in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was top rate, ranking up there with D.W. Griffith's Sunrise and other films acknowledged as silent film classics for their stunning camera work. This camera not only moved but pulled off some effective P.O.V. work as well. Stunning.
The lighting and makeup effects were amazing and clever. Way ahead of their time. The first Jekyll-to-Hyde transformation effect may baffle some viewers today.
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was a very happy surprise. I could see the film as a perfect gateway for those not so interested in classic horror films, but wanting to dip their toes. Go find a copy.
If you can't wait, you can watch the incredible first change scene below.
(Photos from the amazing Classic Horror Film Board.)
I'm not sure how fans of the original Robert Louis Stevenson book pronounce his name, but I was surprised to hear the characters in this film refer to Dr. Jekyll as "Jeek-il". I never knew. For some reason this horror classic escaped my eyeballs. I grew up with a book that had hundreds of frames from the film printed with the script (released by Picador Books) and consequently knew the film inside and out, but I had never actually seen it.
My wife and I remedied this deplorable condition and were amazed at how good Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is. I was surprised how much the film smelled like David Lynch's Blue Velvet. Good and evil splayed and divided into clear black and white. Both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Blue Velvet skate that thin line between realistic, familiar, open-jawed concern and horror, and cartoonish extremes. The first time I saw Blue Velvet I was horrified and had trouble breathing when Frank Booth was on the screen. The second time, I just couldn't stop laughing at his insanity. While Mr. Hyde's inhumanity is similar to Frank Booth's, it is mostly talked about and hinted at. A remake, starring Spencer Tracy as Mr. Hyde was made ten years later, but it was watered down by the Hayes Code's restrictions on motion picture's violent and sexual content, which went into effect in 1934.
Frederic March went on to win a Best Actor award for his portrayal of Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde at the 1931 Academy Awards. His performances were pitch perfect for each character. March's Mr. Hyde not only looked like a de-evolved monkeyman, but the dialog made it clear he was a rapist and sexual sadist. Rough stuff.
Not only was the implied violence through the roof, but this film had side-boob shots all over the place. The sexual innuendo and the amount of shown flesh was surprising for the time.
My understanding of early sound motion pictures was that the loud sounds of the camera required that it be housed in large sound-proof cells, limiting its mobility. Not in this picture. The camerawork in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was top rate, ranking up there with D.W. Griffith's Sunrise and other films acknowledged as silent film classics for their stunning camera work. This camera not only moved but pulled off some effective P.O.V. work as well. Stunning.
The lighting and makeup effects were amazing and clever. Way ahead of their time. The first Jekyll-to-Hyde transformation effect may baffle some viewers today.
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was a very happy surprise. I could see the film as a perfect gateway for those not so interested in classic horror films, but wanting to dip their toes. Go find a copy.
If you can't wait, you can watch the incredible first change scene below.
(Photos from the amazing Classic Horror Film Board.)
Monday, September 16, 2013
Saturday, September 7, 2013
Hansi, the girl who loved the swastika.
Forget all the EC reprint comics in my collection. This is the creepiest.
Created by Al Hartley for Spire Christian Comics, Hansi, The Girl Who Loved the Swastika, tells the story of a young, idealistic German girl who believes, wholeheartedly, in the Nazi way of life and HATES the bible.
After being abused by Nazis and Russian soldiers, Hansi runs into some wonderful American soldiers who take care of her.
Hansi learns to love the bible and moves to America. She and her family board hippies and teach them to get high on religion instead of on doobies.
Friday, August 30, 2013
Monday, July 15, 2013
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man.
Happy birthday to Frankenstein Meets
the Wolf Man. I cannot find an earlier fictional character crossover in film
history. Two monsters for the price of one. A colossal battle royale for the
ages. Sure, Frankenstein may meet the Wolf Man, but more importantly,
Frankenstein's Monster BATTLES The Wolf Man. The film was released seventy
years ago today, March 5, 1943, and remains one of the best known and best
loved of Universal Studios' famous monsters films.
Origin story
Ironically, Frankenstein Meets the
Wolf Man began as nothing more than a joke by screenwriter Curt Siodmak.
Siodmak had just written the screenplay for Universal's mega horror hit, The
Wolf Man, released in 1941. George Waggner had produced and directed the film.
Siodmak and Waggner were both
transplants from Germany and often ate lunch together. Siodmak had a bit of a
sense of humor, while Waggner did not. The epic concept of a monster crossover
came from a simple misunderstanding. Siodmak said of the idea, "I was
sitting down at the studio commissary having lunch with George Waggner and I
said, 'George, why don't we make a picture Frankenstein Wolfs The Meat Man-er,
Meets the Wolf Man?' He didn't laugh. This was during wartime; I wanted to buy
an automobile and I needed a new writing job so I would be able to afford it.
George would see me every day and ask me if I had bought the car yet. I said,
'George, can I get a job?' He said, 'Sure, you'll get a job, buy the car.'
Well, the day finally came when I had to pay for the car. George asked me that
day, 'Did you buy the car?' and I said, 'Yes, I bought it.' George said, 'Good!
Your new assignment is Frankenstein Wolfs The Meat Man-er, Meets The Wolf Man!
I'll give you two hours to accept!'" Naturally, Siodmak had no choice but
to accept this bizarre assignment.
"Whipped cream is good and
herring is good, so they think they should be better together," wryly
commented Siodmak.
It was going to be difficult enough
to continue the saga of his own creation, the Wolf Man, but he also had to find
a way to integrate the Frankenstein Monster (in its fifth film appearance) into
the story. The Wolf Man had ended with Larry Talbot's father beating
Larry to death with a silver headed cane. To death. He beat him to death. Larry
Talbot was dead.
The last outing for the Frankenstein
Monster was, The Ghost of Frankenstein. Through a devious plan, Ygor
(Bela Lugosi) had his brain placed into the body of the Frankenstein Monster
(played by Lon Chaney Jr.) by one of Dr. Frankenstein's sons, Ludwig. The
Frankenstein-Ygor-Monster was then quickly dispatched in a burning building.
The Frankenstein Monster, it should be noted, was blind and spoke with Ygor's
voice at the end of the film.
So, the Frankenstein Monster spoke with the voice of
Bela Lugosi, was blind, and then he died. He was dead. Not living. Not undead.
Just dead. How were these two dead characters going to "Meet" each
other? Why were they going to meet? Who the hell was Lon Chaney Jr. going to
play? Was the Monster really going to sound like Bela Lugosi? Was the Monster
still blind? Siodmak had his work cut out for him.
Siodmak warmed up considerably to
his new assignment when he hit upon an interesting idea involving Dr.
Frankenstein's notebook. "Fortunately, the characters of the two freaks
were established. They might contain the 'weenie.' The 'weenie' is the central
idea around which the screenplay is written. Larry Talbot (that name which I
had given the Wolf Man stuck to him) is aware that at a certain moon phase he
was destined to become a murderer. He also found out that there was no way for
him to escape his fate, even if he died, since some mysterious (studio) powers
would bring him back to life. But if he could find Baron Victor [sic]
Frankenstein, who knew the secret of life and death-didn't he construct a body
of human parts?-he might learn the answer of how he could escape his horrible
fate. On his search for the Baron, he ran into the Frankenstein Monster."
Siodmak had found his weenie. The
Monster had been killed four times at the end of four of his own films. But the
Frankenstein Monster wanted to live. He wanted to live, as badly as the Wolf
Man wanted to die. The Monster had to find Baron Frankenstein, to keep him
alive forever.
Siodmak adds, "One monster
wants to die-another one to live forever; that was the 'weenie' which was the
pivot of the picture."
Story
Frankenstein Meets the Wolfman
balances its weenies with precision. The competing storylines are given almost
exactly the same amount of screen time.
Two grave robbers (Cyril Delevanti
and Tom Stevenson) break into the murky Talbot crypt to rob the recently
deceased Lawrence Talbot (Chaney) of his valuables, which he took with him to
the grave. Unfortunately, they’ve picked the worst possible time to do their
plundering, as a full moon shines through the windows of the crypt and onto the
seemingly lifeless Larry. All of a sudden, a hand reaches out of the coffin and
grabs one of the robbers. Realizing their grave error, the other felon flees
for his life, abandoning his partner to his fate with the revived corpse.
Later, Larry’s unconscious body is
found in the streets by a constable (Charles Irwin) and he is taken to the
Queen’s Hospital in the village of Cardiff. When Larry comes to he is as
confused as anyone about how he got that fractured skull. But after turning
into the Wolf Man once more and killing the constable, he remembers everything
about his curse, which it seems, is an eternal spell more powerful than death.
Desperate for help, he seeks out Maleva (Ouspenskaya) and asks her advice.
Knowing of the incredibly gifted Ludwig Frankenstein, Maleva brings Larry to
Vasaria in hope of a possible cure. Unknown to her is the fact that Ludwig is
dead. The full moon rises, and the increasingly despairing Larry becomes the
Wolf Man yet again. He savages another victim, this time a young girl (Martha
MacVicar). The infuriated villagers chase after the Wolf Man, but he
successfully eludes them amidst the still-standing remains of the Frankenstein
ruins.
There, in the cellar, Larry changes
back into his human self and discovers the Monster (Lugosi) preserved in ice.
Larry frees the Monster from the glacial tomb in the hope that the creature can
find the late doctor’s diary concerning the “secrets of life and death.”
However, neither the blind, weakened Monster nor Baroness Elsa Frankenstein
(Illona Massey), who vehemently vows never to visit the castle again after her
father’s tragedy, are able to help Larry with his quest. The distraught Larry
vents his anger on the villagers at a wine festival when the chief singer (Adia
Kuznetzoff) starts belting out a vibrant song about eternal life. Larry’s bad
social manners are covered up by the Monster’s sudden appearance, which causes
a major panic. Larry and the Monster go back to the castle where they are met
shortly afterwards by Talbot’s doctor from Queen’s Hospital, Dr. Mannering
(Patrick Knowles). When Mannering promises to destroy the Monster by draining
its energy, Elsa has a change of heart and locates the Frankenstein notebook.
Unfortunately, Mannering also has a
change of heart; fascinated as he is by the Monster’s unusual physique, he
can’t resist pumping the creature up with electricity to see it at full
strength. The heavy voltage also restores the Monster’s vision much to his
delight. But, at about the same time, the Monster breaks free of his bonds and
starts carrying off Elsa. Larry, whom Mannering had promised to drain of his
natural life force, but was ignored by Mannering in favor of the Monster, turns
into the Wolf Man and leaps on his towering opponent. The two creatures battle
heatedly, but their fight is a brief one, as one the crankier villagers, Varzec
(Rex Evans), blows up a nearby dam, which floods the castle, drowning both the
Monster and the Wolf Man.
Fortunately for Universal horror
fans the Wolf Man and the Monster live to fight another day. Unfortunately for
the pickier Universal horror fans, Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man slaughters
continuity and hacks at the larger cycle of films.
Siodmak apparently had little
interest in the films predecessor, The Ghost of Frankenstein, choosing to ignore
that movie's Ludwig in favor of the original Henry Frankenstein from the
original classic, thus creating an inconsistency that would plague the
succeeding Frankenstein sequels for the rest of the series.
At the end of Ghost of Frankenstein,
the Monster has had Ygor’s brain transplanted into it’s dome. This has given
the Monster the ability to talk (with Ygor’s voice) but has rendered the
Monster blind (incompatible brain.) Both of these qualities are forgotten in
Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man. Looking for a satisfying reason why? You won't
get one. While scenes of the Monster talking were filmed, they were
subsequently cut out of the final film. Test audiences laughed at Lugosi's
accent. Before Boris Karloff had accepted the Monster role in Universal's first Frankenstein film,
Lugosi had been asked. He refused because the role was mute, the character a
staggering brute. Now, finally, Lugosi agrees to play the Monster on short
notice (they shot for two days with plans for Chaney to play both the Monster
and the Wolf Man) and his lines are cut. Ouch.
Ever the fall guy, Lugosi also
invented one of the more common attributes of the Monster; the outstretched,
clawing, reaching hands. Lugosi was playing the Monster blind. This was not
mentioned in the finished film. Students of the film laugh at Lugosi's
performance. I applaud.
I've always liked the idea of Lugosi
playing the monster in this film. At the end of The Ghost of Frankenstein,
Ygor's brain is slapped into the Monster's body. So, for the Monster to
physically transform and look more Ygor-ish, is kind of a cool idea. Even
though Chaney had a decent enough turn at playing the Monster in The Ghost of
Frankenstein, he truly had to play The Wolf Man. Lon Chaney Jr. IS Lawrence
Talbot. He is the Wolf Man.
Cast and Crew
Lon Chaney, Jr. (born February 10,
1906). Chaney holds a unique accomplishment in horror cinema. He is still the
only actor to have played the Big Four of Universal Monsters: the Wolf Man
(five times), the Mummy (three times), and Frankenstein's Monster and Dracula
once each. Chaney also starred in 1941's Man-Made Monster and a six-film
unrelated series of thriller-mysteries known as the Inner Sanctum films. At a
time when earlier horror icons Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi were slumping a
bit in film genre, Chaney powered Universal through its second great horror
wave in the 1940s. In the wake of the huge success of The Wolf Man, Chaney
became a major star at Universal. "The studio received more mail for me
during that period than any other star," remembered Chaney.Two years
earlier, Chaney had registered a breakthrough performance in a non-horror
classic, Of Mice and Men. Chaney died of a heart attack on July 12, 1973.
Ironically, it was Bela Lugosi, not
Karloff (the man who had definitively played the Monster in the first three
films) who took over the role of Frankenstein's creation from Chaney. Born in
Oct. 20, 1882, Lugosi's major claims to horror fame are as cinema's most famous
Dracula (twice), and what's regarded as his best characterization, the Monster's
sly and sinister friend, Ygor (twice). However, Ygor's physical presence in the
Frankenstein series had come to an end when his brain had been placed inside
the Monster's skull in The Ghost of Frankenstein. Thus it did seem logical for
Lugosi to play the Monster since the script called for the Monster to be
talking and acting as if it still had Ygor's intellect. When the Monster’s
dialog was tossed in the trash, so was Lugosi’s performance. Stuntmen Gil
Perkins and Eddie Parker also played the Monster at various points in the film.
Lugosi died of a heart attack on Aug. 16, 1956.
Playing the role of Elsa
Frankenstein, Ludwig's surviving daughter from The Ghost of Frankenstein, was
Illona Massey (born June 16, 1910). It seems strange that Universal didn't
bring back their leading horror heroine, Evely Ankers, to repeat her role from
the previous Frankenstein film, but Massey was something of a casting coup. She
had briefly been a singing star at big, glossy MGM a few years back, thus bring
a lot of prestige and glamor to Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man. One might
assume Massey would have been embarrassed by her newest assignment, but instead
she was extremely enthusiastic. "Personally, I love horror films," said
Massey, "and that's why I did this one. I thought it would be wonderful to
do a horror film. I really enjoyed it." The quality of this film probably
helped fuel her enthusiasm since she had hated appearing in Universal's 1942
horror offering, Invisible Agent. Massey also really enjoyed working with
Chaney. "I think Lon Chaney is one of the nicest, sweetest people in the
world," remembered Massey. "It was a great deal of fun. You know it
took four hours to put on his makeup and when it was on, it was hot under the
lights. It was very difficult for him to eat. He mostly had soup which he
sipped through a straw and just for fun, we put hot peppers in it! We had a lot
of fun...I never had any difficulty with my co-stars, but Chaney was something
special." Massey died on Aug. 20, 1974.
Dr. Frank Mannering, a quasi-blend
of leading man and mad scientist was played by Patric Knowles (born Nov. 11,
1911). He was the perfect choice since he was not only handsome, but actually
had the acting skills to bring color to that least appealing of roles in a
horror film, the hero. Knowles never made it as a leading man, usually playing
second banana, in the major studio films of the Thirties. His prestige didn't
get bigger at Universal, but the roles did. Knowles' other genre films included
The Wolf Man as well as The Strange Case of Dr. Rx and Mystery of Marie Roget
(both 1942). Knowles died on December 23, 1995 from a brain hemorrhage.
The Mayor of Vasaria was played by
an actor best known for playing a score of mad doctors, Lionel Atwill (born
March 1, 1885). Some film historians even consider Atwill to be the greatest of
all the mad medicos, a remarkable achievement amid such stiff competitors as
George Zucco and John Carradine, to say nothing of Karloff and Lugosi.
Actually, despite his talent, Atwill was almost lucky to be in this film. He
had just emerged from a nasty sex scandal resulting from a trial over a rape
charge involving two women, one of them, a sixteen-year old. Atwill was
convicted of perjury and sentenced to five year’s probation. There was heavy
pressure by the Hays Office for studios not to hire Atwill, but Universal stuck
by his side, a show of loyalty he greatly appreciated. "But for the
courage and magnanimity of one particular studio I guess I should be a dead egg
now," said Atwill. He died on April 25, 1946 from respiratory failure as a
result of bronchial cancer.
Reprising her pivotal role as Maleva
the Gypsy from The Wolf Man was Maria Ouspenskaya (born July 29, 1876). Although
not nearly as well known by name to horror fans as Chaney or Lugosi,
Ouspenskaya became an inconic figure in the horror genre for her
characterization as the mysterious, yet sympathetic Maleva. Indeed, despite her
impressive work in classic dramas of the Thirties and Forties such as Dodsworth
(for which she received an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting
Actress), Waterloo Bridge, and King's Row, Ouspenskaya will always be
remembered first and foremost as the silver screen's most famous Gypsy. It
proved to be an arduous shoot for the elderly actress who suffered a broken leg
when the horse-drawn-cart carrying her and Chaney overturned. Ouspenskaya
suffered an even more traumatic fate at the end of her life when she fell
asleep with a lit cigarette. She died from her burns and a resulting stroke on
Dec. 3, 1949.
The most notable face among the bit
players belonged to Dwight Frye, one-time Renfield and Fritz of Dracula and
Frankenstein respectively. A common supporting player in Thirties' horror films,
Frye's career had almost completely dried up and he died shortly after
completing this film.
Another notable face was provided by
Dennis Hoey, Inspector Lestrade in Universal's Sherlock Holmes series.
Universal's A-Team of horror talent
behind the camera was in full force for the making of Frankenstein Meets the
Wolf Man. John B. Goodman and Martin Obzina created some excellent sets,
including the remarkably eerie graveyard featured in the film's opening. George
Robinson provided his usual superb camerawork, with some nice use of shadows in
the film's atmospheric first half.
Both of the monsters' makeups were done by the legendary
creator of Universal's famous creatures, Jack P. Pierce. He created the
definitive images for the Frankenstein Monster, the Wolf Man, and the Mummy to
name but a few. Even such brilliant contemporary makeup artists such as Rick
Baker and all the technology available to them haven't succeeded in
overshadowing Pierce's unique concept for Frankenstein's Monster or the Wolf Man.
But although Pierce used the same original makeup design of built up
cheesecloth for the Monster's famous flat head that had originated with
Karloff's career making debut in "Frankenstein," the results looked
far less impressive on Lugosi's distinctive and slightly rounded face. A quick
look at the other actors (Karloff, Chaney, and Glenn Strange) as the Monster
reveals they were well suited both physically and facial for the role.
Unfortunately, Lugosi looked more like a participant in a Halloween costume
party rather than a valid movie portrayal of Frankenstein's Monster, greatly
diminishing the impact of the creature in this film.
Fortunately, Pierce's
makeup for the Wolf Man was even slightly more impressive than that of
"The Wolf Man." Once again Pierce meticulously glued strand after
strand of yak hair onto Chaney's face, hands, and feet. Pierce received a
powerful assist from Universal's special effects ace, John
P. Fulton who supervised the excellent transformation scenes. This was
achieved by keeping Chaney pinned in position so he couldn't move and setting
targets for his eyes so he could hold them still. The camera was weighed down
with a one ton weight to likewise keep it immobile. Then five to ten frames of
film would be shot, after which Pierce would apply more makeup, and another
five to ten frames of film would be shot, and so on until after 22 hours of filming, the
transformation was complete. Quite an ordeal for Chaney who would
mutter threats about wanting to kill Siodmak for having conceived the Wolf Man
in the first place! Small wonder Siodmak kept his distance from Chaney while he
was in his Wolf Man makeup even though for the most part, the two men were good
friends.
Helming all these components together was director Roy
William Neill, whose claim to fame was the stellar work he did on 11 of
Universal's 12 Sherlock Holmes films. Although Neill wouldn't direct another
Universal monster film he had a real flair for the horror genre, expertly using
shadows and dark lighting to convey a real sense of menace to many of his films.
His work on the best of the Sherlock Holmes films, The Scarlet Claw, is a great
deal scarier than many of Universal's
horror films. Neill's superb staging of the opening graveyard sequence,
Talbot's first transformation scene, and the Wolf Man's murder of the constable
rank among the very best moments in all the Universal classics. Given his
outstanding direction on Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, it's truly a shame
Neill didn't get an opportunity to direct any other Uinversal horror film but
he was simply too invaluable to the Sherlock Holmes series to be used elsewhere.
One final key ingredient that was added to Frankenstein
Meets the Wolf Man after filming was completed was the first rate music
provided by Hans J. Salter. Fittingly, the opening credits used a smooth blend
of both the opening themes for The Wolf Man and The Ghost of Frankenstein. Many
other pieces from both these films were re-sused, but Salter came up some
memorable new bits, notably the music for the graveyard scene, Talbot's
transformation into the Wolf Man, and Talbot and Maleva's journey to the
village of Vasaria. Salter also composed the lusty folk song "Faro-la, faro-li"
which was sung with gusto by Russian actor/singer Adia Kuznetzoff. Frankenstein
Meets the Wolf Man's music was so memorable that it was used frequently in
future Universal horror and Sherlock Holmes films.
Reception
Universal had high hopes that Frankenstein Meets the Wolf
Man would be a blockbuster and it didn't disappoint. The film premiered at the
Rialto Theater on Broadway, March 5, 1943 and was popular enough to run from
8:30 am to nearly 4:00 am. The film scored heavily at the box office in other
theaters across the country and was Universal's top horror attraction of 1943.
Critics were up and down on the film. With Variety calling
the film a “creepy affair in grand style,” and commenting that Siodmak’s script
“delivers a good job of fantastic writing to weave the necessary thriller
ingredients into the piece, and finally brings the two legendary characters
together for a battle climax.”
Bosley Crowther over at the New York
Times commented that the film was “Not very horrible.” Crowther also expressed
the same concerns that many have had, “Here Universal had gone to work and dug
the Wolf Man out of his coffin, where he had been sleeping peacefully since his
last film, and sent him in quest of Dr. Frankenstein just so he could meet the
latter’s famed mechanical man. (Of course the Wolf Man had no knowledge that
the doctor had been dead for several years even though they both worked for
Universal; he wanted to consult him about the hair on his face.) And then, when
he does meet the monster in the burned-out castle of Dr. Frankenstein – well,
they both hit it off magnificently. There’s only a little tussle between them
at the end. And that only lasts but a moment. They are both washed away during
the same.”
Crowther also has a suggestion for
Universal: “Why not unite with Monogram and turn out a horror to end all
horrors – “Wolf Man and Monster Meet the East Side Kids”? Monsters in a comedy
film? What a sick joke.
The horror team ups were just
getting started. However, after House of Dracula and House of Frankenstein
Universal went to their last bountiful well, and in 1948 released Abbott and
Costello Meet Frankenstein. The monsters turned to comedy to keep them afloat.
It is a sad end to a once mighty empire.
Many years later Frankenstein
Meets the Wolf Man’s financial success repeated itself when it was released on
video cassette. In New York in the fall of 1986, nearly all the New York stores
sold out of their copies of Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man.
by Vince Logothetti and Emerson Murray
The stills were found on the
ever-amazing Classic Horror Film Board
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)